Qualcomm’s next flagship silicon series, called the Snapdragon 875, is expected to be unveiled next month. It is arguably the most important moment for flagship smartphone OEMs and buyers in 2021. The chip will shape the performance graphs of many future Android devices.
As the successor to the 865, the 875 is expected to lead to increased performance and more economical battery consumption. But will it challenge the next Samsung Exynos chip or, more importantly, Apple’s A14 Bionic?
We recently asked readers in a poll how they’d like Qualcomm to improve the Snapdragon 875. Here is what you told us.
What would you like to see of the Snapdragon 875?
Results
Over 1,000 readers voted on it, and an overwhelming majority only want one thing: more speed. 51.2% of readers want the Snapdragon 875 to match or flash the Apple A14 Bionic. This is a big challenge, even if the 875 with a Cortex-X1 core hits the market with the first performance.
Apple’s new silicon has proven to be faster than the Snapdragon 865 Plus, which powers the Samsung Galaxy S20 and Note 20 series, as well as the Asus ROG Phone 3. In fact, Qualcomm’s current flagship chip still lags behind the A13 Bionic in terms of raw performance. The chipmaker has designed its work to bring Apple’s last generation chip in line with its next generation.
Continue reading: What is a SoC? Everything you need to know about smartphone chipsets
Those who don’t want to embarrass Apple users would settle for a lower price. 30% of voters wanted the Snapdragon 875 price to drop below the Snapdragon 865 price. However, it is unclear whether cheaper silicon will help stifle the ever-increasing prices for flagship smartphones.
After all, only 17.6% of readers would like Qualcomm to regulate the Snapdragon 875’s power consumption. A longer battery life is always a fair requirement, especially since 5G and displays with high refresh rates increase the demands on power cells even further.
Here’s what you told us:
We asked readers to list what the Snapdragon 875 will hopefully bring. One comment was noticed.
In this article, users also shared their thoughts on Apple’s growing chipset lead over Qualcomm’s competition.
- Tony Talks: I don’t think that’s honestly important anymore. Only the hardcore tech enthusiasts really care. The performance has long been great, with almost no noticeable difference.
- Lamar Taylor: Android phones use inferior Snapdragon chips that are a year or two behind Apple’s A-series chips.
- Unicon743: It’s sad, but honestly, there isn’t a single Android phone, at any cost, that beats last year’s underclocked A13 in an iPhone SE. $ 400 iPhone SE.
- Bubba Jones: Yes, the iPhone is a powerful device and it clearly beats Android. If someone isn’t rendering videos, compressing databases, or creating other applications with continuous CPU intensity, all the extra power is lost in my opinion.
That’s it for this poll. Thank you for your votes and comments. If you have any further thoughts on the Snapdragon 875 or its competing silicon, drop a line below.