If I had a dollar for every time a client or a stakeholder used “AI” and “Machine Learning” interchangeably in a meeting, I’d have retired to a private island by now.
As someone who has spent the last decade building data pipelines and training models—from simple regression scripts to massive deep learning networks—I know the terminology can be confusing. The hype cycle doesn’t help. Marketing teams love to slap an “AI-Powered” sticker on everything that uses a simple ‘if/then’ statement.
But if you are looking to enter the field, or just want to sound competent in your next tech meeting, you need to understand the distinct boundaries between these three concepts.
Here is the no-nonsense explanation based on my years of practical application in the field.
⚡ Key Takeaways (For the Skimmers)
The Hierarchy: It’s a Russian Nesting Doll (Matryoshka). AI is the biggest doll. Machine Learning fits inside AI. Deep Learning fits inside Machine Learning.
AI (Artificial Intelligence): The broad concept of machines acting “smart” (can include simple rule-based code).
ML (Machine Learning): Algorithms that parse data, learn from it, and make a decision without being explicitly programmed for that specific task.
DL (Deep Learning): A specialized subset of ML using “Artificial Neural Networks” inspired by the human brain. It requires massive data and heavy computing power.
The “Nesting Doll” Visualization
Before we get technical, you have to visualize the relationship. When I’m onboarding new junior data scientists, I draw three circles on the whiteboard:
Outer Circle: Artificial Intelligence (The broad goal).
Middle Circle: Machine Learning (The techniques to achieve the goal).
Inner Circle: Deep Learning (The specific, high-power technique driving the current boom).
If you use a Deep Learning model, you are technically using Machine Learning and AI. But if you use a basic AI script, you aren’t necessarily using Machine Learning.
Let’s break down what this actually looks like in production.
1. Artificial Intelligence (AI): The Big Wrapper
Definition: Any technique that enables computers to mimic human intelligence.
My Experience:
In the early days of my career, we built “AI” that wasn’t smart at all. It was just a massive list of rules. We call this GOFAI (Good Old-Fashioned AI) or Symbolic AI.
For example, I once worked on a chatbot for a customer service portal years ago. It didn’t “learn” anything. I literally had to program it:
If user says “refund”, show “billing page”.
If user says “return”, show “billing page”.
If the user typed “I want my money back,” the bot failed because I hadn’t explicitly programmed that phrase. That is still “AI” because the machine is simulating a human interaction, but it is rigid.
What you need to know:
AI includes everything from the ghosts in Pac-Man (programmed logic) to ChatGPT.
General AI vs. Narrow AI: Right now, in late 2025, we effectively only have Narrow AI (great at one task, like driving or writing code). We do not yet have AGI (General AI), which is a machine that can perform any intellectual task a human can.
2. Machine Learning (ML): The Engine Room
Definition: The science of getting computers to act without being explicitly programmed.
My Experience:
This was the game-changer for me. I moved from writing rules to writing algorithms that find the rules.
A few years back, I worked on a project to predict housing prices. Instead of writing code that said “If the house has 3 bedrooms, add $50k to the price,” I fed a Machine Learning algorithm (like a Random Forest or Linear Regression) 10,000 examples of past house sales.
The machine looked at the data and figured out the correlation between bedrooms and price itself. If the market changed, I didn’t rewrite the code; I just fed it new data.
Key Characteristics:
Statistical: It relies heavily on math and statistics.
Feature Engineering: This is the hard part. In traditional ML, I have to tell the computer what to look at (e.g., “Pay attention to the square footage column”).
Not a Black Box: With standard ML, I can usually explain why the model made a decision.
3. Deep Learning (DL): The Heavy Lifter
Definition: A subset of ML capable of learning unsupervised from data that is unstructured or unlabeled, using neural networks.
My Experience:
Deep Learning is where things get expensive—and impressive. I remember the first time I tried to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for image recognition on my laptop. It nearly melted.
DL uses “Artificial Neural Networks” with many layers (hence “Deep”).
The Input Layer: Takes in raw data (pixels of an image).
Hidden Layers: The “magic” happens here. Millions of calculations extract features.
The Output Layer: The final guess (e.g., “This is a cat”).
The Critical Difference:
In the ML housing example above, I had to tell the computer which columns were important. In Deep Learning (like recognizing a face), I don’t tell the computer “look for a nose” or “measure the distance between eyes.”
I just throw 50,000 photos at the neural network, and it figures out what makes a face a face. It learns the features automatically.
Pros & Cons I’ve Found:
Pro: Unbeatable accuracy for images, audio, and text (LLMs are based on DL).
Con: Requires massive hardware (GPUs) and huge datasets. If you only have 500 rows of data, Deep Learning will fail miserably. Stick to ML.
The “Cat Detector” Test: A Practical Example
To make this stick, here is how I would approach the same problem—detecting if a photo contains a cat—using all three methods.
The AI (Rule-Based) Approach
I would write a program that scans the image for specific shapes.
Code: “Look for two triangles (ears) on top of a circle (head).”
Result: Fail. If the cat is looking sideways or sleeping, the code breaks.
The Machine Learning Approach
I would manually extract features from thousands of images.
Process: I write code to detect edges and colors, then feed that data to a classifier (like a Support Vector Machine).
Result: Okay. It works for clear photos, but struggles with lighting changes or weird angles.
The Deep Learning Approach
I feed raw pixel data into a Convolutional Neural Network.
Process: I don’t define “ears” or “whiskers.” The network figures out those patterns exist on its own after processing 10,000 labeled images.
Result: Excellent. It can identify a cat even if it’s hiding under a blanket with just a tail visible.
Comparison Cheat Sheet (What We Use in Industry)
When I’m deciding which tech stack to use for a client, I run through this mental checklist:
| Feature | Machine Learning (Traditional) | Deep Learning |
| Data Requirements | Can work with small amounts of data. | Needs massive amounts of data. |
| Hardware | Runs on a standard CPU/Laptop. | Requires high-end GPUs. |
| Training Time | Minutes to hours. | Hours to weeks. |
| Interpretability | High (I know why it decided X). | Low (It’s a “Black Box”). |
| Best For | Spreadsheets, customer segments, forecasting. | Images, NLP (text), self-driving cars. |
My Bottom Line
Don’t get hung up on the buzzwords.
If you are just starting your journey in 2025, start with Machine Learning. You cannot be good at Deep Learning if you don’t understand the foundational statistics of ML.
I often see students jumping straight into PyTorch or TensorFlow to build neural networks without understanding bias, variance, or overfitting. That is a recipe for building models that look smart but fail in the real world.
Think of it this way:
AI is the car.
Machine Learning is the engine.
Deep Learning is the turbocharger on a Ferrari engine.
You don’t need the turbocharger to go to the grocery store, but you definitely need it to win the race.
Standard laptop screen running a Jupyter Notebook vs. a massive server rack/GPU setup to visually demonstrate the hardware difference.
Discover more from Prowell Tech
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
