Anticipating the Hasselblad X2D II: An Analysis of Leaks and Potential Upgrades

Anticipating the Hasselblad X2D II: An Analysis of Leaks and Potential Upgrades

The Hasselblad X2D 100C, since its introduction in 2022, has garnered significant attention as a high-end 100-megapixel medium-format camera. Its appeal lies in its striking minimalist design and a user experience primarily focused on capturing exceptional still images . Hasselblad has successfully carved out a distinct position in the market with this model, prioritizing aesthetic and image quality over an extensive feature set commonly found in competing cameras, thereby attracting a specific segment of photographers who value these attributes above all else. The sentiment expressed by the user, stating that the X2D 100C would likely be their camera of choice if budget were no concern, underscores the strong desirability and enthusiast appeal of this medium-format system . This personal endorsement highlights the high expectations placed on its potential successor.

Recent leaks have ignited considerable anticipation within the photography community for a follow-up model, tentatively named the X2D II . These leaks suggest that Hasselblad is preparing to introduce an updated version of its flagship mirrorless medium-format camera. Such developments within the high-end camera market often generate considerable buzz, as enthusiasts and professionals eagerly await advancements in technology and performance.

The recent activity surrounding the potential Hasselblad X2D II began with a post shared by Photo Rumors, which highlighted a Hasselblad filing with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for a product identified as ‘HB722’, dated December 4, 2024 . FCC registrations are a common precursor to the launch of new electronic devices, as manufacturers typically require approval before these products can be sold in the United States. This filing often provides an early indication of forthcoming releases within the technology sector. Accompanying this FCC registration was a photograph that appeared to depict the top plate of an X2D II camera, further fueling speculation about an imminent successor to the current X2D 100C . Visual leaks of this nature can offer initial clues about design changes or continuations in the upcoming model.

Mirrorless Rumors also corroborated the leak of the X2DII top plate image , B_1]. Their report included information suggesting that the core specifications of the new camera might largely mirror those of the existing X2D 100C. However, a significant point of emphasis in these early rumors is the expectation of notable improvements in the autofocus system , B_1]. This focus on autofocus suggests that Hasselblad is likely addressing a key area where the current model has received user feedback and faces competition. The designation “II” in the potential name, X2D II, typically implies an iterative update, suggesting that the new model will build upon the foundation of the X2D 100C with targeted enhancements rather than a complete redesign . This naming convention leads to speculation that a more substantial upgrade might be branded with a more significant numerical jump, such as X3D.

Discussions on online platforms like Reddit’s r/hasselblad, centered around the FCC registration of the HB722 model, have further explored the possibilities for this new camera , B_3]. These discussions have considered various scenarios, including the HB722 being the X2D II, a more advanced X3D, a special edition variant of the X2D, or even a minor hardware revision of the existing model, perhaps to address component supply chain issues. Notably, the dimensions and battery specifications detailed in the FCC documents appear to align closely with the current X2D series, making the likelihood of a completely different form factor, such as a new 907x or H camera, seem less probable , B_3]. Enthusiast communities often play a crucial role in dissecting early information and forming collective expectations about upcoming products.

The user’s anticipation for the Hasselblad X2D II is clearly articulated through a list of five key upgrades they hope to see in the new model . These desired improvements predominantly revolve around enhancing the camera’s focusing capabilities and overall speed of operation. This specific focus from an experienced user of the current model provides valuable insight into the practical limitations and areas for potential advancement in the X2D series.

At the forefront of the user’s wishlist is a desire for more sophisticated autofocus features, specifically a precise subject detection autofocus mode with the ability to recognize and track people, including eye detection . Modern mirrorless cameras have made significant strides in autofocus technology, and advanced subject detection has become a standard expectation in high-end systems. The current X2D 100C, while featuring Hasselblad’s most advanced autofocus system to date, is acknowledged to lag behind the performance offered by leading mirrorless cameras from brands like Sony, Canon, and Nikon . The user emphasizes that autofocus precision is particularly critical given the immense detail captured by the 100-megapixel sensor, which can further accentuate any focusing errors. The inclusion of reliable eye detection autofocus would significantly enhance the shooting experience, particularly for portrait photography, making photoshoots more relaxed and ensuring sharper results. 

In addition to the precision of autofocus, the user also expresses a strong preference for autofocus that is significantly faster and more reliable in general . While acknowledging that a medium-format camera like the X2D 100C is not intended for sports or wildlife photography, the user points out that quicker focusing would be highly beneficial for portraiture work. Reviews of the X2D 100C support this sentiment. One review noted that while the phase-detection autofocus system is indeed fast and accurate, the implementation of face detection feels somewhat underdeveloped, not being readily accessible in the main autofocus menu , B_4]. Another review characterized the X2D 100C’s autofocus as slow and basic by contemporary standards, mentioning its limitation to AF-S (single autofocus) without any tracking capabilities , B_5]. These observations underscore the user’s desire for a more robust and responsive autofocus system in the X2D II.

The second major area for desired improvement is the continuous burst shooting speed. The X2D 100C is limited to a continuous shooting rate of just 3.3 frames per second . The user understands that this limitation is likely due to the large file sizes produced by the 100-megapixel sensor. However, they point out that the Fujifilm GFX100 II, a direct competitor, offers a significantly faster burst rate, more than double that of the Hasselblad . While the user reiterates that they would not typically use a medium-format camera for capturing fast action, they would appreciate the option of faster frame rates, particularly for portrait sessions. Furthermore, the user suggests that a quicker burst shooting capability could potentially enable a usable high-resolution shot mode, similar to those found in smaller-format cameras, which could combine multiple exposures to create images with dramatically increased resolution, perhaps even a 400-megapixel file from a Hasselblad. The Fujifilm GFX 100 II, for instance, can achieve up to 8 frames per second with its mechanical shutter , B_6], and even higher speeds using its electronic shutter or in a cropped full-frame mode , B_6]. Comparisons with other cameras also highlight the X2D 100C’s relatively slower speed performance .

The user’s third and fourth desired upgrades relate to the camera’s suitability for landscape photography, a natural strength of a high-resolution medium-format system. They express a hope for better weather-sealing and improved battery life in a future X2D II . The user explicitly states that they were not overly impressed with the X2D 100C in these two aspects . Weather sealing is widely recognized as a crucial feature for landscape photography, as photographers often encounter unpredictable and challenging weather conditions , B_10]. The ability to continue shooting in light rain or dusty environments without concern for damaging the camera is a significant advantage. Similarly, good battery life is essential for landscape photographers who may spend extended periods in remote locations without access to charging facilities . While some user reviews of the X2D 100C suggest that the battery life is generally good, lasting a full day for some users , B_8], other comparisons note that its battery autonomy is limited to around 420 shots, which could be restrictive for longer shooting sessions .

Finally, the fifth upgrade on the user’s list is the addition of video recording capabilities. The X2D 100C is notably absent of any video recording functionality . While the user acknowledges that they would not instinctively reach for such a camera for video work, they express excitement at the prospect of Hasselblad’s renowned color science being available in an 8K video format . In today’s evolving landscape of content creation, the ability to capture both high-quality stills and video in a single device is increasingly valued. The Fujifilm GFX 100 II, for example, offers a comprehensive suite of video features, including 8K and 4K recording, making it a more versatile tool for photographers who also engage in video production , B_7]. However, it’s worth noting that Hasselblad’s historical focus has been firmly rooted in still photography, and the absence of video in the X2D 100C may reflect a deliberate strategic decision to concentrate on its core strength . 

When considering the potential improvements in the Hasselblad X2D II, it is essential to contextualize it within the competitive landscape, particularly against the Fujifilm GFX 100 II. The user themselves identifies the GFX100 II as a key rival with a superior burst shooting speed . Indeed, the Fujifilm GFX 100 II is frequently recognized as a primary competitor to the Hasselblad X2D 100C in the high-resolution medium-format mirrorless market .

One of the most significant differentiators between the two systems is their autofocus capabilities. The Fujifilm GFX 100 II generally offers a more advanced autofocus system, incorporating AI-based subject recognition and tracking, which is reported to be more effective when photographing moving subjects . This contrasts with the Hasselblad X2D 100C, where, despite improvements over previous models, the autofocus system is still perceived as lagging behind in terms of subject detection and tracking. The GFX 100 II also boasts significantly faster continuous burst shooting speeds, reaching up to 8 frames per second compared to the X2D 100C’s 3.3 frames per second . This difference provides the Fujifilm camera with an advantage in situations where capturing a sequence of images is desired. Furthermore, the GFX 100 II offers a comprehensive suite of video recording features, including high-resolution 8K capture, which are entirely absent in the Hasselblad X2D 100C , B_7]. This makes the Fujifilm a more versatile option for photographers who require both still and video capabilities.

Despite these advantages in speed and features offered by the Fujifilm GFX 100 II, the Hasselblad X2D 100C is consistently lauded for its exceptional color science, often referred to as the Hasselblad Natural Color Solution (HNCS), and its minimalist yet premium design . These aspects represent Hasselblad’s core strengths and appeal to photographers who prioritize image quality and the tactile experience of using the camera above all else.

To better illustrate the key differences between these two competing models, the following table provides a side-by-side comparison of their specifications in areas relevant to the user’s query:

Beyond the user’s primary requests, there are other potential enhancements that could further improve the Hasselblad X2D II. The user mentions a desire for a faster processor . An upgraded processor could lead to noticeable improvements in various aspects of camera performance, including quicker autofocus acquisition, a deeper buffer for continuous shooting, and smoother menu navigation. Many of the user’s desired improvements are likely contingent on having sufficient processing power. Refined handling is another aspect on the user’s wishlist . While the X2D 100C is generally praised for its design and ergonomics, subtle refinements could further enhance the shooting experience. For instance, one review highlighted the absence of a joystick as a significant drawback in handling the X2D 100C , B_5]. The inclusion of a joystick could offer a more intuitive and efficient method for selecting focus points.

The user also expresses that more lenses are always a welcome addition to any camera system . A broader selection of high-quality lenses increases the versatility of the system and caters to a wider range of photographic needs and creative visions. Hasselblad has been actively expanding its XCD lens lineup, with three new lenses announced in 2024 , B_9]. This demonstrates a commitment to the X mount and provides more options for photographers invested in the system. Rumors have also suggested the potential development of a new E-series zoom lens . The introduction of zoom lenses would complement the existing range of prime lenses, offering greater flexibility in framing and composition. Currently, the XCD lens lineup comprises 14 lenses, while Fujifilm’s GF mount offers 17 . While the difference is not substantial, continued expansion of the XCD lens range could further strengthen the appeal of the Hasselblad system.

Hasselblad’s design philosophy for its X series cameras centers around a blend of iconic design, Scandinavian sensibility, and exceptional performance . The brand’s identity is deeply rooted in its rich heritage and distinctive design principles, which undoubtedly influence its product development strategy. The overarching aim is to create high-performance products that possess a strong and recognizable personality, often drawing inspiration from the classic V system cameras of the past . This suggests that while Hasselblad may incorporate new technologies and features, it will likely do so in a manner that aligns with its established aesthetic and brand identity. The X system, from its inception, was conceived with the traveling photographer in mind, emphasizing portability, comfort, and uncompromising image quality . This focus indicates that while achieving ultimate speed might not be the primary objective, usability and image fidelity in real-world shooting scenarios are key considerations for Hasselblad. 

Hasselblad’s apparent dedication to celebrating still photography might explain the absence of video features in the X2D 100C . The company may be intentionally positioning its X series as a dedicated tool for capturing still images, catering to photographers who prioritize this specific discipline. This could imply that the X2D II might also maintain this focus, despite the increasing demand for hybrid cameras with robust video capabilities. Comparisons between Hasselblad and competitors like Fujifilm suggest that Hasselblad caters to a more niche market of photographers who appreciate a slower, more deliberate approach to image-making, placing a premium on image quality and the overall shooting experience . This market positioning suggests that while Hasselblad may address some performance limitations in the X2D II, it might not aim to directly compete with feature-rich cameras like the GFX 100 II across every single specification.  

In conclusion, the available leaked information and the FCC registration strongly indicate that the Hasselblad X2D II is likely to be introduced as an iterative upgrade to the highly regarded X2D 100C. Based on the user’s expressed desires and the competitive landscape, significant enhancements are anticipated in the areas of autofocus speed and precision, potentially including advanced subject and eye detection capabilities. While a notable increase in burst shooting speed is plausible to better align with competitors such as the Fujifilm GFX 100 II, the precise extent of this improvement remains to be seen. Given the X2D 100C’s capabilities in landscape photography, improvements in weather sealing and battery life are also probable. The inclusion of video recording functionality in the X2D II is less certain, considering Hasselblad’s historical emphasis on still photography within its X series. However, the user’s enthusiasm and the broader market trend towards hybrid cameras suggest that this would be a well-received addition. Ultimately, the Hasselblad X2D II is poised to be a refined version of an already highly desirable camera, likely addressing some of its current limitations while staying true to the brand’s core values of exceptional design and outstanding still image quality. Photography enthusiasts can reasonably expect an enhanced shooting experience with improved performance in several key areas.